Critisism on curleys wife
How old is curleys wife
People are trying to overlay today's urban values onto an agrarian culture more than half a century old. Just because there's a gathering of men doesn't mean that sexism is ground into the wood grain of every piece of furniture. The review stated that my version of the character was intentionally lacking in the vamp department so as to dissuade the viewer from thinking that "she was asking for it," -- "it" being her death. With all that coverage, nobody mentioned the topic of women's rights in connection with Of Mice and Men. A tool is a tool; he would have used it more than once. It was the Depression, and people were too worried about survivial to worry about women's rights. Crooks, a character who is forced to live in the barn and away from the other men, says that it's "because I'm black. That isn't to say there aren't viewers undisturbed by the sight of this broken woman, and the lengthy scene that follows her death wherein she lies lifeless and untouched, center stage. Even today there's no mention in Wikipedia of the subject in conjunction with the novel. The further along in the production we go, the more I realize that the audience agrees.
Just because there's a gathering of men doesn't mean that sexism is ground into the wood grain of every piece of furniture. Without question, it was a commentary on the social climate at the time, which still surprisingly applies today.
It doesn't seem to get less painful for me, less terrifying, less tragic with time, yet our unusually young audience seems unfazed, if not amused by the savage act.
Of mice and men
A modern audience cringes and immediately identifies. Literarily, Curley's wife is compared to an animal in an effort to reduce and humiliate her. If this woman is purely a victim, why is she so hated? No man has ever considered her as anything except a girl to try to make She is mockingly referred to as a "Lulu," the same name for Slim's dog, described as a bitch who just "slang nine pups. It's a waste of energy to interpret a work of classic literature by current norms and values. What would be the point of emphasizing her as Curley's property? I was up to Curley to introduce his wife to the men, but his social skills weren't exactly stellar. But in dissecting this piece for five months now, I've found that within the writing, there is both a lack of reason to truly hate this woman, and the inevitable and undeniable urge to do so. Throughout this run I've come to recognize these common reactions, and eventually understand them without resentment. Curley is "the boss's son. It would have been uncharacteristic of Steinbeck, if he were taking a feminist position, not to step up and take credit for it. But why? But nowhere, in this or any of his novels or short stories that I have read, is the omission of a character's name used to establish victimhood, of sexism or any other prejudice. That isn't to say there aren't viewers undisturbed by the sight of this broken woman, and the lengthy scene that follows her death wherein she lies lifeless and untouched, center stage.
While I acknowledge the added drama, I see no proof of sexist implication and attribute no other thematic or plot significance to the missing name. If Steinbeck was making a feminist point by withholding her name, he'd have mentioned that at least once, either in an interview or in his correspondence, neither of which has been brought to light.
In such a case, and absent a last name for Curley, the men were left with "Curley's wife" as the obvious reference. Apparently he had not done so. She is violently shaken, rendered lifeless.
How would you expect them to refer to her--"that woman with the curly blonde hair?
Maybe Curley wanted to discourage contact with the field workers. Others suggest it is merely a way of emphasizing her connection with her husband, adding drama because of his volatile temperament.
I tell you I just want to talk to somebody. That isn't to say there aren't viewers undisturbed by the sight of this broken woman, and the lengthy scene that follows her death wherein she lies lifeless and untouched, center stage.
based on 13 review